Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

Agape Healing Arts

Health & Wellness Center

385 Tequesta Drive Ste. 4 Tequesta FL 33469 ~ Office 561-762-4273



X-Ray Vision in Hindsight: Science, Politics and the Mammogram

Posted on May 28, 2020 at 11:00 PM

X-Ray Vision in Hindsight: Science, Politics and the



For decades, it was an article of medical faith: Get a mammogram; it could save your life.  Now, seemingly overnight, that faith has been shaken. The mammogram — that yearly ritual for millions of American women — has become the focus of a bitter and unusually public scientific dispute that is being fought in the pages of medical journals and the columns of daily newspapers. Scientists, policy makers and politicians have scheduled meetings and Congressional hearings.

In the end, though, there is not likely to be a quick answer to the central question of whether researchers were right when they said that screening healthy women reduces death from breast cancer or, to put it another way, whether women should still get that annual mammogram.

"What a mess, what a complete mess," said Cindy Pearson, executive director of the Women's National Health Network, an advocacy group that has been flooded in recent days with phone calls from anxious women. "They want to know what is all this based on, is there some sort of sneaky, behind-the-scenes thing going on?"

How that mess came to be is a story of science and politics and the business of medicine, and a war on cancer that seized upon mammography as a central weapon. It also is a story of the way science struggles toward an ever evolving "truth."

The mammogram has always been a modest weapon, with benefits that women must weigh against possible risks. It is a screening tool that misses some tumors. At most, studies have found, it can cut the breast- cancer death rate by 30 percent.

Even when mammograms do "work," what they find does not always turn out to be cancer. The cancer they find may be growing so slowly that it would never threaten a woman's life. The result can be surgery, radiation and chemotherapy that is not medically necessary.

Over the years, scientists and statisticians have quietly debated the merits of mammography. Most of the public debate, though, has focused on its effectiveness for women in their 40's. That was already in considerable doubt when the larger issue broke open last fall with the publication of a study by a pair of researchers based in Denmark. They argued that the clinical trials most often cited to support mammogram recommendations were too flawed to be reliable. Last month, an influential but independent panel of experts at the National Cancer Institute agreed and said it could no longer make a recommendation about whether women should be screened.


"These are huge issues," said Dr. Barnett Kramer, chairman of the panel and associate director of disease prevention at the National Institutes of Health. "They shake my confidence."

For its part, the cancer institute says that after reviewing the matter, it concluded that the new analysis did not refute evidence that mammography works, and that it is standing by its recommendation that women 40 and older be screened.

Many of those who did the original trials are vigorously defending their work. While there are flaws in the studies, they say, the Danish analysis exaggerated their significance and misinterpreted facts.

A number of experts agree.

"I think the trials have imperfections," said Dr. Steven Woolf, a member of the United States Preventive Services Task Force, a panel that reviews scientific evidence about disease prevention. "But the issue is whether they invalidate the studies. My own view is that they do not rise to that level."

Since a new trial would require tens of thousands of women and a decade for results, some scientists are talking about digging deeper and more carefully into the old ones.  Now, mammography supporters, led by the American Cancer Society, worry that the uncertainty will weaken the government's resolve. They say mammography is a leading reason that the breast-cancer death rate has been dropping for the last decade.

Others, including those skeptical of mammography, ask whether the decline is a result of better treatments, especially the drug tamoxifen. For them, the furor is an opportunity to turn the focus of the war against breast cancer toward better treatment and the search for a cure.

A leading skeptic is Dr. Donald Berry, a medical statistician at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, where techniques were developed in the 1950's that spread mammography throughout the nation. Dr. Berry is a member of the federal advisory panel that is backing away from its support of mammography.

"Breast people here think I'm doing a disservice to women, and I think they are doing a disservice to women," Dr. Berry says. "Who's right?"

A Eureka Moment

One evening in late 1970, Sam Shapiro took his research team to a Swiss restaurant in Manhattan, where he broke the news that transformed the medical and political approach to breast cancer.

Dr. Philip Strax, a radiologist who had begun impressing surgeons by finding tumors before they could feel a lump, was at the table. To see if the mammograms really worked, Mr. Shapiro, the research director at Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York, had begun a scientific inquiry called a randomized trial. He divided women, ages 40 to 64, into two groups, and gave mammograms to just one.


The study had paid off, Mr. Shapiro told his colleagues that evening. In the first seven years of the study, 81 of 31,000 women who had mammograms died of breast cancer, compared with 124 of 31,000 who were not screened, a difference in the breast cancer death rate of a little more than 30 percent.

"It was thrilling," recalls Dr. Raymond Fink, who was in charge of recruiting women for the study. It was, he adds, "one of those movie moments," like the scene in "The

Story of Louis Pasteur" when Paul Muni says, "I found the germ!"

Mammograms took off.

Before long, the National Cancer Institute, the American Cancer Society and other organizations issued guidelines telling women to have mammograms starting at age 40. The federal government advocated the breast X-ray like no other medical procedure. It pushed states to promote its use, compelled insurance companies to pay the bills and rode herd on the radiologists who did mammograms to ensure that they did a good job. Now, an estimated 30 million women are having annual mammograms, and many are having additional tests, like sonograms, when findings are suspicious. That leads to annual costs of more than $3 billion, said Dr. Martin L. Brown, an economist at the National Cancer Institute.


A Question of Age

From the start, there was concern among scientists that mammograms did not work as well for women in their 40's, whose denser breasts make tumors harder to spot and who are much less likely than older women to have breast cancer in the first place. To help resolve the question, some urged the cancer institute to halt its promotion of mammograms for these younger women until it did another scientific trial. Instead, in what became a string of flip-flops, the agency in 1977 merely stopped recommending mammograms for women in their 40's.

It reversed course in the late 1980's, citing new data that also helped persuade the American Cancer Society and other groups to promote screening for younger women.

Then in 1993, still more findings led the institute to abandon the screening recommendation for women in their 40's.

Each move was hotly debated, and the issue festered in scientific circles until 1997, when the agency's new director, Dr. Richard Klausner, asked the National Institutes of Health to convene a new panel.

Dr. Leslie R. Laufman, an Ohio cancer specialist, said that before joining the panel, she had never really questioned the evidence about mammograms. At 49, she said, she had been having the screening test herself. "I was walking the walk and talking the talk," she said.

But after spending four months reading more than 100 scientific papers and then hearing 32 presentations in a two-day meeting, she and others concluded that women in their 40's should not be told to get screened, and she made a personal decision not have the test herself.

The reason was twofold, the panel said. First, the evidence that mammograms helped was tenuous. Second, there were risks in getting screened.

Over the years, scientists have learned that not all breast cancer acts alike. Some tumors grow fast, others slowly. Furthermore, nearly one-fifth of the 230,000 or so cases of breast cancer being found every year are a condition called ductal carcinoma in situ, or D.C.I.S.

Mammograms are especially good at finding D.C.I.S. But the problem is that many if not most of these growths — the science on this question is weak — might never spread. Too little is known about breast cancer biology to tell which ones will pose a threat. Thus, women must run the risk of getting unnecessary and dangerous treatment: radiation, chemotherapy, surgery.

The panel presented its findings to an audience packed with radiologists and advocates, with boos and hisses punctuating the proceedings. Dr. Klausner created his own stir when he said that he disagreed with the panel.

Then Congress got into the act, instructing the cancer institute to recommend that women in their 40's have mammograms. The institute reversed course and complied.

"Now, women in their 40's will have clear guidance based on science and action to match it," President Bill Clinton had said.

But if the guidance for women in their 40's was murky, the consensus that screening worked for women in their 50's and 60's would soon be thrown into doubt.

The Doubters of Denmark

Dr. Peter C. Gotzsche said he had never thought much about mammography until the Danish Medical Association asked him to look into it.

As director of the Nordic Cochrane Center in Copenhagen, Dr. Gotzsche belonged to a research collective known as the Cochrane Collaboration, which is striving to improve the quality of scientific studies and reporting.

When he and his colleague Ole Olsen looked at the seven large clinical trials on mammography, they concluded that they were too flawed to support mammography recommendations, a finding they reported two years ago in the British science journal Lancet.

The report drew little public attention. It was their deeper analysis, published in October, that touched off a firestorm.

Dr. Gotzsche and Mr. Olsen cited a number of things they said weakened the research, including potentially inaccurate records of causes of death, differences in screening schedules and possible discrepancies in the health histories of women in one of the trials.

In that case, the HIP study in New York, 853 women in the mammography group were excluded because of a previous diagnosis of breast cancer; only 336 were dropped from the unscreened group. If the two groups really were equivalent to start with, and if an extra 500 or so in the unscreened group should have been dropped but were not, that would have been a serious problem, Dr. Gotzsche and Mr. Olsen said.

But while some leading medical experts were convinced, many study researchers maintain that the Danish critique misinterpreted data, failed to account for statistical adjustments that corrected problems, read too much into disparities in the numbers and raised alarming questions without offering evidence that the results were actually skewed.

For example, says Dr. Anthony Miller, who reviewed deaths in the HIP trial, the disparity in excluded women would have been a problem only if anyone with a prior history of breast cancer slipped into the final death tallies, thus distorting the results. Systems were put in place to avoid that, he says.

"They latched onto these small differences, which have ready explanations, and sort of magnified them," Dr. Miller said. Dr. Gotzsche says he stands by the analysis. "There are no objections that make us doubt what we have done," he said. The Danish critique also reported that the screened women had more medical and surgical treatments. Treatment is appropriate when it saves lives, but if the death rate from breast cancer was no lower in women who had mammograms, that raises questions, the researchers said, of whether the test does more harm than good.

Last month, the panel at the National Cancer Institute concurred with the Danish report and said it would be as rational for a woman to decide not to have the test as to decide to have it. The panel plans to rewrite the assessment that it posts on the cancer institute's Web site.

But others, including scientists who have looked skeptically at mammography over the years, say they are not convinced that the mammography trials were so flawed that their results should be ignored. "Over all, I am not persuaded," said Dr. Suzanne Fletcher of Harvard Medical School, who was chairwoman of a 1993 federal panel that reviewed mammography, "although I thought there were some very important and interesting issues that these authors have raised."

Still, Dr. Fletcher and others say they would like to see an independent committee have access to and review the original data from all the trials, including patient records, so that answers might be obtained to the questions the Danish research raised.


A Tool With Limitations

For women and their doctors, the uncertainty is immensely exasperating, given that nearly four decades have passed since researchers began trying to find out if mammograms work.

"The bottom line is that if you're still not sure whether it's good or not, it can't be that good," says Dr. Vincent Rajkumar, an oncologist at the Mayo Clinic. "It can't be phenomenally effective."

Moreover, scientists say that the value of mammography cannot be weighed without taking into account the complex biology of breast cancer and the increasing effectiveness of treatment.

Some tumors grow so fast that mammograms cannot spot them before they spread — and even if they could, the treatment might not be good enough to make any difference. In other cases, the treatment is so effective that it does not matter if the tumor is found with a mammogram or somewhat later, when a lump can be felt, voiding the whole need for early detection.

"An extreme example of that is testicular cancer," says Dr. Peter Greenwald, director of the division of cancer prevention at the National Cancer Institute, "where you can cure all stages, so you don't see a mortality benefit from early detection." For now, even as they acknowledge mammography's limitations, many doctors say it is the best tool they have. While mammograms might not catch some deadly tumors fast enough to make any difference, and they cannot predict which tumors will prove to be deadly, many doctors believe that early detection does help them save some lives.

"I can think of many women where a mammogram was helpful in picking up something before it had spread to the lymph nodes," said Dr. Lynn Hartmann, a breast cancer specialist at the Mayo Clinic. "So I am not at the point of saying we should discard this tool. Until we have a more effective substitute, I continue to recommend mammograms, and I continue to have them."

Still, if all the ambiguity is maddening, that is not to say that the debate is unwelcome.  When Dr. Gotzsche took the stage at a conference of the National Breast Cancer Coalition last May to present his work, he checked the path to the exit, fearing he might be run out of the hall. Instead, a third or more of the audience rose to applaud.

The group's president, Fran Visco, explained, "Many of our members have long felt that the data is poor, that we oversell screening to the public, that we don't talk about the risks and we don't focus enough attention on preventing breast cancer."

"They were thrilled to have someone question all that."

Categories: None

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.


Reply bape outlet
5:21 PM on August 10, 2022 
I have to show some appreciation to the writer just for bailing me out of this particular predicament. Right after scouting through the search engines and coming across tricks which were not productive, I was thinking my life was well over. Being alive without the presence of answers to the issues you've resolved as a result of your good short article is a crucial case, as well as the kind that would have in a negative way damaged my career if I had not encountered your website. Your ability and kindness in maneuvering almost everything was helpful. I don't know what I would have done if I had not encountered such a subject like this. I am able to at this moment look ahead to my future. Thanks for your time very much for your high quality and result oriented help. I won't think twice to refer your site to any person who requires guide about this matter.
bape outlet
Reply air jordans
5:19 PM on August 10, 2022 
I am glad for writing to make you be aware of what a cool experience my wife's child went through reading yuor web blog. She figured out numerous pieces, not to mention how it is like to possess a great teaching nature to get a number of people without hassle gain knowledge of a variety of very confusing issues. You truly surpassed our own expectations. Thank you for showing such essential, safe, informative as well as easy thoughts on this topic to Jane.
air jordans
Reply golden goose outlet
5:18 PM on August 10, 2022 
I must express my appreciation to the writer for bailing me out of this particular situation. As a result of exploring through the world-wide-web and coming across advice which were not pleasant, I was thinking my life was over. Existing devoid of the solutions to the issues you've solved as a result of the website is a critical case, and the kind which may have in a negative way damaged my career if I had not discovered your blog. Your primary mastery and kindness in touching every item was important. I don't know what I would've done if I hadn't come across such a thing like this. I can also at this moment look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot very much for the high quality and results-oriented help. I will not hesitate to recommend your web blog to any person who needs and wants recommendations on this topic.
golden goose outlet
Reply supreme clothing
5:17 PM on August 10, 2022 
I have to express my thanks to you for rescuing me from this challenge. Right after browsing through the world-wide-web and finding principles which are not productive, I was thinking my entire life was well over. Living without the answers to the difficulties you've sorted out through your entire article content is a critical case, as well as the ones that might have badly damaged my entire career if I had not discovered your site. Your talents and kindness in playing with all the details was priceless. I don't know what I would've done if I had not come upon such a thing like this. I can also at this point look ahead to my future. Thanks very much for your reliable and amazing help. I will not be reluctant to suggest the website to anyone who should receive assistance about this issue.
supreme clothing
Reply moncler
12:34 PM on August 10, 2022 
I and also my friends ended up looking at the best information and facts located on the blog and so immediately came up with a terrible suspicion I had not thanked you for those techniques. These men became for this reason warmed to read through all of them and have now seriously been loving these things. We appreciate you indeed being indeed considerate and for considering these kinds of extraordinary things millions of individuals are really desperate to learn about. My personal sincere regret for not expressing appreciation to sooner.
Reply paul george
12:33 PM on August 10, 2022 
I am also writing to make you know of the really good encounter my cousin's daughter enjoyed browsing your web page. She noticed plenty of pieces, most notably what it's like to have a great helping style to get certain people with no trouble know specific specialized things. You undoubtedly did more than her expectations. Many thanks for churning out those powerful, trusted, informative and easy thoughts on your topic to Lizeth.
paul george
Reply yeezy supply
8:39 AM on August 10, 2022 
I wanted to put you this bit of observation just to give many thanks again for those precious thoughts you have contributed above. This is certainly remarkably open-handed with people like you to present extensively all that a few individuals could possibly have offered for sale as an e book in making some bucks for their own end, particularly considering that you could have tried it in the event you decided. These secrets also worked to provide a great way to understand that some people have the same eagerness like my personal own to know the truth great deal more when considering this problem. Certainly there are lots of more pleasurable opportunities ahead for many who start reading your blog post.
yeezy supply
Reply birkin bag
5:12 PM on August 9, 2022 
I together with my buddies were actually studying the best pointers on the website and all of a sudden developed an awful suspicion I had not thanked you for those techniques. All of the young men came for this reason warmed to read them and now have really been loving them. Appreciate your truly being quite thoughtful and also for settling on variety of fantastic subject areas most people are really desirous to know about. My sincere regret for not expressing appreciation to you earlier.
birkin bag
Reply off white outlet
3:28 PM on August 9, 2022 
I truly wanted to send a small comment so as to say thanks to you for all the awesome pointers you are showing at this site. My prolonged internet research has finally been compensated with incredibly good information to talk about with my friends. I 'd mention that many of us website visitors actually are truly lucky to exist in a very good network with very many special individuals with beneficial tactics. I feel really privileged to have used your site and look forward to tons of more pleasurable minutes reading here. Thank you once again for all the details.
off white outlet
Reply jordan shoes
3:28 PM on August 9, 2022 
A lot of thanks for each of your effort on this blog. Gloria really likes going through investigation and it is obvious why. I learn all of the compelling method you present very helpful ideas by means of the web blog and even invigorate participation from other individuals on the content so my girl has always been understanding a great deal. Take advantage of the remaining portion of the new year. You are performing a really good job.
jordan shoes
Reply supreme hoodie
3:27 PM on August 9, 2022 
Thank you a lot for providing individuals with an extraordinarily splendid opportunity to read in detail from this website. It's usually very pleasant and as well , full of fun for me and my office acquaintances to visit the blog particularly thrice in a week to read through the fresh items you will have. And indeed, I am certainly fulfilled with all the dazzling concepts you give. Certain 3 areas in this posting are in fact the simplest we have all had.
supreme hoodie
Reply cheap kyries
3:26 PM on August 9, 2022 
I not to mention my pals were found to be viewing the excellent helpful tips found on the website and unexpectedly I got a terrible feeling I had not thanked the blog owner for those techniques. These women are already totally warmed to see them and have certainly been taking pleasure in them. Thanks for really being quite accommodating and for deciding upon certain fine things millions of individuals are really desirous to understand about. My honest apologies for not saying thanks to sooner.
cheap kyries
Reply yeezy
3:25 PM on August 9, 2022 
Thank you so much for giving everyone an exceptionally terrific chance to read critical reviews from this blog. It is often so enjoyable and also jam-packed with fun for me and my office colleagues to search your website at least three times every week to learn the fresh items you have. Of course, I'm at all times fascinated concerning the exceptional inspiring ideas you give. Certain 3 facts in this article are truly the most suitable we have had.
Reply off white shoes
3:25 PM on August 9, 2022 
I really wanted to make a small comment so as to say thanks to you for those amazing items you are giving on this site. My long internet research has at the end of the day been recognized with awesome facts and techniques to go over with my company. I 'd assert that many of us site visitors actually are definitely endowed to be in a fabulous website with so many awesome professionals with useful plans. I feel truly grateful to have discovered the web pages and look forward to so many more cool times reading here. Thank you once again for a lot of things.
off white shoes
Reply cheap curry shoes
3:17 PM on August 9, 2022 
Thank you for your whole effort on this web site. My mom loves making time for investigations and it's really easy to understand why. Most of us learn all concerning the powerful tactic you make advantageous techniques via the blog and therefore improve response from some other people about this concern so my girl has always been learning a great deal. Enjoy the remaining portion of the new year. You are conducting a useful job.
cheap curry shoes
Reply studiogorsel
3:06 PM on August 9, 2022 
spandex shorts for dresses youth nike raiders 42 karl joseph black team color stitched nfl vapor untouchable limited jersey reebok new england patriots jerod mayo 51 white replica jerseys sale monster energy hat red zone black and gold nike air jordan 18
Reply Wimlat
12:38 PM on August 9, 2022 
erectafil 10 mg
Reply yeezy
10:30 AM on August 9, 2022 
I wish to show some appreciation to you just for rescuing me from such a predicament. As a result of checking through the internet and obtaining things that were not helpful, I assumed my life was gone. Being alive devoid of the solutions to the issues you have sorted out as a result of the posting is a critical case, and the ones that could have in a wrong way damaged my career if I had not encountered your web site. Your primary knowledge and kindness in playing with all things was helpful. I don't know what I would've done if I had not discovered such a point like this. It's possible to now look forward to my future. Thank you very much for your specialized and sensible help. I will not think twice to recommend the website to anybody who needs guide about this matter.
Reply golden goose
10:28 AM on August 9, 2022 
I precisely needed to thank you very much yet again. I do not know the things that I could possibly have gone through without these recommendations shown by you regarding that subject matter. Previously it was the daunting case for me, nevertheless being able to view a well-written strategy you resolved it made me to cry with contentment. I am thankful for this support and in addition hope that you find out what an amazing job you're accomplishing instructing the others through the use of your webblog. Probably you've never met any of us.
golden goose
Reply cheap russell westbrook shoes
10:28 AM on August 9, 2022 
I must express some thanks to this writer just for bailing me out of such a predicament. Just after researching throughout the world-wide-web and finding concepts which are not powerful, I thought my life was gone. Living minus the solutions to the issues you have solved by way of your main write-up is a critical case, as well as the kind that would have badly damaged my career if I hadn't encountered your blog. That talents and kindness in touching all areas was excellent. I am not sure what I would've done if I hadn't come across such a subject like this. I am able to at this time look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot very much for the professional and result oriented guide. I won't hesitate to propose your web site to anybody who will need assistance on this issue.
cheap russell westbrook shoes